Officers of Parliament: Accountability, Virtue and the Constitution (Collection Minerve)
Availability: In Stock
The officers of Parliament now form a group which includes the Auditor General and seven other "ethical regulators". Because of its independence and the nature of its members' mandates, this group is thought to be key to restoring the public's faith in government. However, the officers do not clearly fall within one of the three branches of government and are not fully subject to democratic accountability mechanisms, raising questions about the legitimacy of their exercise of authority. This thesis explores alternative theories for supporting the legitimacy of officers of Parliament and draws lessons from that exercise for the future development of this virtues-based institution. OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS Introduction Who are the officers of Parliament and why do we have them?
  • Purposes behind the creation of officers of Parliament
  • The result – the current officers of Parliament
  • Do the officers of Parliament form a unit?
  • Conclusion – Values-based Mandates
Why are officers of Parliament important?
  • Impact on individuals
  • Impact on management of departments
  • Impact on Parliament and parliamentarians
  • Impact on the public
  • Conclusion
The constitution and the legitimacy of officers of Parliament
  • Which branch of government appoints and removes the officers?
  • Which branch of government do they work for?
  • Who directs them?
  • Which branch do they most closely resemble?
  • Who is accountable for them and to whom do they account?
  • On whose behalf do they act?
  • Conclusion
The legitimacy of officers of Parliament – An alternative approach
  • Perceived legitimacy
  • Beyond the perception
  • Alternate sources of legitimacy
  • Conclusion
The legitimacy of officers of Parliament – Lessons learned
  • The reasons for their structure and mandates
  • The need for a decision-making framework
  • New officers of Parliament/new mandates?
  • Matters for potential reform
  • Conclusion
Appendix: Comparison of three executive agencies with the officers of Parliament
  • The Canadian Human Rights Commission
  • The Public Service Commission
  • The Security Intelligence Review Committee
Bibliography Table of legislation Table of cases Analytical index
Couverture souple
Éditions Yvon Blais

Pouvons-nous vous aider ?

Pour une assistance immédiate, veuillez communiquer avec le service à la clientèle au 1 800 363-3047.